Exploration: Gamifying Sleep No More

For a period time I counted myself among Sleep No More‘s “superfans,” people who almost religiously returned to the show to experience it, despite the increasing cost of the ticket over the years (which led to my eventual “retirement” when it became clear spending up to 1,000 a year wasn’t worth it). I’ve come to question what it was about the experience that attracted me to it so much, that made me return almost monthly for two years, that sometimes draws me back to it every once in a while, especially when I’m in New York on holiday. Only now, reflecting sometime later, am I recognizing it as a “gaming” experience.

In conventional theater you presumably see the whole thing in one night. At Sleep No More, it is impossible to see and experience every possible element of the McKittrick Hotel in a single night, despite the 3-hour run-time and the “time loop” element of storytelling. It becomes something of a challenge to go back and try to experience everything, especially the 1:1s where actors perform a scene just for you. I remember an interview Felix Barrett did with Eurogamer a few years ago regarding another Punchdrunk production where he understood the experience of “playing the game” of getting the 1:1s, knowing where to stand so a performer would look at you, or knowing performers reward loyalty with 1:1s or something special––I recall a night where one of the characters I was following kept looking at my T-shirt and during my 1:1 he even whispered “I love your shirt.” Moments like this expand the breadth of the number of experiences you can have in Sleep No More, because things keep changing up. Hypothetically, you could go see it for years and never have the same experience twice.

Looking at experiences like Fullbright’s Tacoma or Lucas Pope’s Return of the Obra Dinn, the philosophy of exploration as part of the game is there much like it is in Sleep No More: in fact, Tacoma‘s storytelling method was partially inspired by Sleep No More and even has a direct reference to the show (though I won’t say what). But Sleep No More has an element to it that Tacoma doesn’t really have and Obra Dinn sort of has but not quite: an element of replayability. Part of the joy of Sleep No More is going back to it and experiencing it over and over again. With Tacoma you can more or less get the whole story in one go without the need to play again to see if you missed anything; Obra Dinn you may have to go through the game a few times to get the complete story, but once you’ve done that there’s not really much of a point in doing it again.

I think exploratory games like Tacoma and Obra Dinn need to explore ways of making experiences that, even if you get the whole story, are still fun to go to again and again, either by having more material for the players to find or just making it an experience worth checking out again and again.

2 thoughts on “Exploration: Gamifying Sleep No More

  1. Having seen the Rocky Horror Picture show too many times in theatres too many times, I can relate to your period of religious attendance at Sleep No More. There’s something interesting about constant improvisations around a central entertaining piece. However, often times, the jokes that make me laugh the most at Rocky Horror are those I hear everytime I come to the theater. It seems the issue with something like Obra Dinn or Tacoma is that their status at games prevents a sort of pure fealty to the experience. Rather than creating branching paths or experiences, these sorts of game simultaneously reject gameplay having an effect on the story, while in the process making gameplay the only way to experience a story. Ergo, the player’s objective is to simply get the story. Whereas in a game that goes deeper on gameplay like Mass Effect, the story is experienced in varied ways alongside gameplay, and thus becomes repeatable to experience a new story just the same as new gameplay. What hinders the two games as repeatable experiences is that by giving you a story to find and having you find, they place finding the entire story as a gameplay objective in itself, with checking the floorboards not a particularly repeatable activity.


  2. I wonder, what do you think this means in the context of an ARG? Specifically regarding the ideas of exploration, unique experiences, and replayability (such that replaying creates new experiences). I can definitely see where elements of exploration can be implemented in an ARG as well as places where unique and intimate 1:1 experiences can be created, but replayability is definitely an interesting element to add to the play that I don’t exactly know how to fit it in. Would it simply mean holding the whole ARG again like how Sleep No More does several shows a week, or could there somehow be elements of “replayability” in the sense of reusing a game mechanic or using a “rewind” element to a scene/game?


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s