Obra Dinn’s Space

Return of the Obra Dinn is a game about occupying space and transcending time.  When the player first boards the ship, the image which they are greeted with is foreign and foreboding.  The distinct 1-bit color scheme creates an aesthetic which is quite unlike most other games, and the ship’s large size with multiple different decks  However, the space of the Obra Dinn itself is not the only area which is thoroughly explored and uncovered by the player throughout the course of the game’s run time.  The journal, another core mechanical function, is another.  The way in which these two spaces overlap creates a cross-section where the player’s spatial knowledge of the world is weaved with larger narrative points into a cohesive presentation.

One of the quotes on game design mentioned at the start of the Jenkins piece is that “interactivity is almost the opposite of narrative; narrative flows under the direction of the author, while interactivity depends on the player for motive power”.  Return of the Obra Dinn subverts this definition of game narrative by creating different spaces which are simultaneously static and also significantly informed by player choice.

The world of the ship is certainly the most static of the two, though it nonetheless embodies interactiveness through its nonlinearity.  The majority of the gameplay consists of engaging finding the corpses of fallen crew members and going back in time to the moment of their death.  Here, the narrative of the game is conveyed almost entirely though environmental storytelling, primarily functioning by “embed[ing] narrative information within [its] mise-en-scene” (Jenkins, 5).  The freeze-frame gives the player time to walk around the static death scene and investigate every single detail, from the decorum on the walls to the expressions on the faces of each and every nearby character.  Though these are told individually from one another, they occur in the same, and often overlapping, spaces of the ship.  When the player exits a chapter (a sequence of these individual scenes which tell a short narrative), they return to walk around the ship with greater knowledge of how it entered its dilapidated state.  

In the assigned interview, Felix Barrett provides an account of the experience of his play Sleep No More.  This play takes approximately 9 hours worth of content, but each experience lasts only a few hours.  This forces participants to pick a route through the narrative and leads to a naturally divergent experience, even if the content which is being presented is ultimately the same.  Though Obra Dinn presents all of its information on a single play through, it nonetheless parallels Sleep No More through its nonlinear yet sequential storytelling. Most of the chapters in Obra Dinn can be encountered in any order as all of the corpses are in existence on the ship. The only guidance the player is provided is a start location conveniently near the dead first mate and a map detailing how the sequences map onto the physicality of the ship. This allows for some degree of player agency, as they may choose their starting point, which will lead to different identities being revealed earlier in their experience.

However, the vast majority of player interaction in this narrative-driven game occurs in the space of the journal. Like the ship, opening the journal is also an intimidating experience at first. The game forces the player to flip through all of its pages, including more than a hundred pages of unanswered questions and puzzles which are to be encountered. As the player moves through the space of the ship and its physical space is narratively contextualized, the changing physical space of the journal provides further narrative context. As puzzles are revealed and sufficient information is provided, the blurred faces of the passengers become revealed, allowing for the player to guess their identity. Trial and error is encouraged because of its system of confirming identities in threes, encouraging the player to flip through its pages and look for any hints they might have missed. The order in which the narrative is truly revealed is formed by the player’s decisions with regards to whose identity they try to reveal, especially because finding out the true name of one crew member can snowball and allow for educated guesses on multiple others.

The book serves as a tracker of progress, progress which is nonlinear (despite the linear narrative) and dependent on the game’s interactive elements. Additionally, it’s inclusion of the map and crew member photos encourages familiarity with the information it provides, and players will find themselves hopping from page to page. One particular clue, regarding the location of where the escaped passengers went, requires either an extraordinary memory or many many minutes of flipping through the book’s entire contents. Though the narrative is presented on the space of the ship, the pages are where a great amount of the narrative context is provided, and the narrative arises from the interaction between these two areas.

At the end of the game, the Obra Dinn herself has a completely different feeling than at the start.  What previously felt empty and foreboding now feels storied and full of historic, fantastical drama. The interactive nature of the story contrasts greatly with the necessity of linear storytelling, but creates an experience which feels captivating and engaging (especially as compared to similar games like Gone Home wherein the player is forced to more linearly through the narrative). Because of this storytelling style, by the time the player disembarks the Obra Dinn it feels as though they were one of the passengers themselves. The game is an excellent example of how to construct an interactive narrative and exemplifies many of the unique features of the format of video games.

3 thoughts on “Obra Dinn’s Space

  1. You noted in your post how the spacial story telling of Return of the Obra Dinn facilitates immersive game play and even enable the player to feel a sense of familiarity with the world of the story. I think the sense of intimacy cultivated by the special mechanics might have contributed to this sense of familiarity. While watching the death of the characters resemble a play, the game breaks down the traditional boundary and shortens the distance between the “audience” and the “actor” and enables us to be on stage and examine the actors’ lives in detail, closely. This is something both Sleep No More and Obra Dinn tries [or rather, forces the audience to] do–though the audience cannot be an actor, the shortening of physical [and temporal?] space does increase the sense of involvement.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Your summary of Return of the Obra Dinn was very detailed and you touched upon great elements that make the interactive nonlinearity of this game so intriguing. I liked specifically how you mentioned player agency as it applies to the notion of choosing ones own path. Though one arrives to the same conclusion, there are a multitude of routes the players can take to get there. Having all of these potential paths, gives every single player a slightly different experience because no two people will approach all 60 crew members embedded narratives in the same way. Having a still frame of the moments of death seem like such a unique twist to a game. It allows the player full control of what they take out from each still frame. I am sure there are players who miss a few details along the way. This would again proves how fascinating the elements of interactive nonlinearity are within Return of the Obra Dinn.

    Like

  3. I agree with a lot of what you said, but I’ll be honest, I had a very hard time getting through the game to feel that fulfilling ending, even if I knew it was there. In Professor Jagoda’s classes, we have had conversations about “productive boredom” and pushing through something because the end result is worth pushing through. I have a hard time distinguishing when that is the case. Especially if I am looking to play a game casually, I don’t think I can make it through these games even if the ending is now this beautiful state and feeling. Of course, there are special cases where it truly is worth it, but I don’t know that I want to take those elements of Obra Dinn into my own games.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s